Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1960No. 7219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

The trial court sustained a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed. The judgment is affirmed.

No statement of facts has been filed. Good cause excusing delay has not been shown or suggested. Nor has permission for late filing been requested under provisions of Rule 386, Vernon’s Ann.Texas Rules. The transcript contains an application to the trial judge for an extension of time for filing the statement of facts and an order granting an extension. This application and order implies that some proceedings of a nature properly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gowan v. ReimersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Uvalde Construction Co. v. JoinerTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Nance v. McClellanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hurley v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Whitaker v. FormbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Southern Lloyds v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API