Legal Opinion

Nance v. McClellan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1936No. 6446PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge SMEDLEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

Application for writ of error was granted on an assignment of error presenting the contention that to this case should be applied the general rule announced by Russell v. Industrial Transportation Company, 113 Texas, 441, 251 S. W., 1034, 258 S. W., 462, 51 A. L. R., 1, that proof of pecuniary loss or damage is essential in a suit to rescind a contract for fraud. We have reached the conclusion, however, that the case, by reason of its peculiar facts, comes within an established and fundamentally sound exception or…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Frame v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ladies' Benev. Soc. of Beaumont v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Bryant v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Robison v. Whaley Farm CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Dreiss, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. Texas Industrial Trust, Inc. v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Shrives v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Moore v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Grocers Supply Co. v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API