Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Stuyvesant Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 11, 1961No. [No. 335, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants below from a final decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Sodaro, J.), dated January 10, 1961. The decree declared that Ordinance No. 437 of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, ap proved August 4, 1960, providing for the regulation of those engaged in the business of becoming surety for compensation in criminal cases, was invalid. The decree enjoined the appellants from acting under or enforcing the provisions of said ordinance, and required costs to be paid by the appellants.

The questions presented below and considered on this appeal are: (1)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. People Ex Rel. Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Rossberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  5. Heubeck v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Barry Properties v. Fick Bros. Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Sanza v. Maryland State Board of CensorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. SitnickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API