Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Tousey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal-by.the defendants, Sinclair Tousey and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term -and entered in .the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of September, 1907,-appointing a temporary receiver of “ all the property, assets and effects; of every description, of the defendant -corporation, Frank Tousey, Publisher,” during the pendency of the action. .. •

1Opinion of the Court

Lambert, J.:

The' plaintiff, as executor of tiie estate of Rosalie T. Hastings, deceased, a stockholder in the defendant corporation, brings this action in equity to procure a judgment restraining the individual defendants from in any manner interfering with the assets or property of the defendant corporation, or disposing of the same; suspending them from the offices of directors, president, vice-president and secretary and treasurer, respectively ; that a receiver lie appointed of the property and assets of the defendant corporation, giving power and authority to such receiver to conduct the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mabon v. . Ongley Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. In re HastingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Abramson v. BlakeleyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Romano v. Belt Painting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Dudley v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API