In re Hastings
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the petitioner, George Gordon Hastings, as executor, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office.of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of July, 1908, denying the .petitioiier’s application for á peremptory writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
On a former appeal this court held that, as -the only'title to stock of the corporation then shown by the petitioner .was as temporary administrator, he was-not entitled to the examination (Hastings v. Tousey, 121 App. Div. 815).. Before renewing the- application, letters testamentary had been duly issued to the petitioner and he had *517qualified as executor and had thereafter duly renewed his demand upon the corporation for the privilege of the inspection, for which he has again appealed to the court. The material facts existing when the application as temporary administrator was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hastings v. TouseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Levine v. Pat-Plaza Amusements, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- Getman v. Mohawk Valley Nursing Home, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- In re GillNew York Supreme Court · 1948