Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Smyth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1900No. 3456PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. • — • Hon. Orange Jacobs, Judge.

1Per curiam

Eespondents were charged with the violation of an ordinance of the city of Seattle, which makes it unlawful for any contractor or suh-contractor upon any of the public works of the city to require or permit any day laborer or mechanic to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day. It is charged in the complaint that the respondents “did wilfully and unlawfully permit one John Doe to work and labor . . . more than eight *329hours in one calendar day.” The superior court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and the city has appealed.

Statutes and ordinances similar in character have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Low v. Rees Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In re MorganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Ex parte KubackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Keefe v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. State v. MullerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Woods v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. State v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API