Legal Opinion

Ex parte Kuback

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1890No. 20680PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Application to the Suprem corptis. The facts are stated in i! art for a writ of habeas opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was tried and convicted *275of a misdemeanor under the following ordinance of the city of Los Angeles: —

“ The mayor and the council of the city of Los Angeles do ordain as follows: —
“ Sec. 1. Eight hours’ labor constitutes a legal day’s work in all cases where the same is performed under the authority of any ordinance, resolution, or contract of the city, or under the direction, control, or by the authority of any officer of the city, acting in his official capacity; and a stipulation to that effect must be made a part…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Frober v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Low v. Rees Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API