State Ex Rel. Manion v. Dawson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Certiorari. (1) Secs. 2 and 40 of Circuit Court Drainage Dist■trict Act of 1913 are in pari materia and must be read together; and when read and considered together, they mean that all the fundamental conditions for organizing a drainage district prescribed by Section 2 must be present, before the court can render judgment extending the boundary lines of such a district to include other large tracts of land. Crimes v. Eeynolds, 184 Mo. 688; Crimes v. Eeynolds, 94 Mo.
Read the full summary
Certiorari. (1) Secs. 2 and 40 of Circuit Court Drainage Dist■trict Act of 1913 are in pari materia and must be read together; and when read and considered together, they mean that all the fundamental conditions for organizing a drainage district prescribed by Section 2 must be present, before the court can render judgment extending the boundary lines of such a district to include other large tracts of land. Crimes v. Eeynolds, 184 Mo. 688; Crimes v. Eeynolds, 94 Mo. App. 584; Sales v. Barber Asphalt Pav.- Co., 166 Mo. 677; Lewis-Sutherland on Statutory Construction, secs. 368, 443; Both v.…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, J.
This is an original proceeding by certiorari in this court, against the respondent as judge of the Gentry County Circuit Court. The object of the proceeding is to quash the record of that court in a, proceeding for the extension of the boundary line of the Albany Drainage District.
The Albany Drainage District obtained a preliminary decree of incorporation at the March Term, 1917, of the court aforesaid. The proceeding was under the Act of 1913, Laws 1913, pages 232 to 267 inclusive, with reference to the incorporation of drainage districts by ciruuit courts. Thereafter, in July, 1918, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Meier v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Buschling v. AckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Prior v. Buehler & Cooney Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. JaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Gash v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Ludlow v. GuffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. NeafSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.