Legal Opinion
United States v. Rhines
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 4, 2011No. 10-4077PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Gary Rhines, a prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the District Court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Because the appeal does not present a substantial question, we will summarily affirm.
I
Rhines was convicted of possession with intent to distribute fifty grams of cocaine base and was sentenced to life in prison. We affirmed the conviction and sentence, see United States v. Rhines, 143 Fed.Appx. 478 (3d Cir.2005), and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari, see Rhines v. United States, 546 U.S. 1210, 126 S.Ct. 1422, 164 L.Ed.2d 118 (2006).…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. DenedoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Alan R. StonemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Stanley BaptisteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Conrad Lee JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- Ravidath Ragbir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Amin De CastroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Walter HimmelreichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Rhines v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- BURT v. HICKSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.