Legal Opinion
BURT v. HICKS
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 29, 2021No. 1:20-cv-19459Unknown
1Opinion
[ECF Nos. 10, 29] THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE STEVEN C. BURT, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 20-19459 (NLH/SAK) MARCUS O. HICKS, et al., Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court by way of a Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) filed by Plaintiff, Steven C. Burt (hereinafter “Plaintiff”). See Mot. for Pro Bono Counsel [ECF Nos. 10, 29]. No opposition has been filed. The Court has considered Plaintiff’s two submissions.1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b), and for the reasons set…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Jeffery Montgomery v. Steven Pinchak Al Ortiz Terry Moore C. Naficy, Mr. C.M.S. Correctional Medical ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Paul Lamont Parham v. Marshall Johnson, Jr., Medical Doctor Charles J. Kozakieqicz Tom Forester, Commissioner Joseph Mazurkiewicz, ph.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Enora Perez v. Wdlls Fargo N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Jerome MacLin v. Dr. FreakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.