Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Glass

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1975No. Civ. No. 33646PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Frank and Ellenora Lynch and Edward and Elizabeth Fitzsimmons appeal from a judgment determining that they have no easement rights over a road across property of defendants Warren and Ida Lou Glass and James S. Erway.

In 1965, respondents and others blocked off from public access a road known as Wolfback Ridge Road crossing partially undeveloped territoiy west of Sausalito. Appellants sued to establish their claimed right to use the road, alleging alternatively that the road was a public way or was subject to a private easement in their favor. The judgment for respondents…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lynch v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API