Best Lock Corp. v. Review Board
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
Appellant Best Lock Corporation has a company rule which prohibits the use of tobaceo, alcohol and drugs both while at work and away from work (the TAD rule). Five-year employee Daniel Winn admitted drinking at a bar and was fired for violating Best Lock's rule. He claimed unemployment compensation on the basis there was no just cause for his firing. The Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment and Training Services (Review Board) agreed, and Best Lock appeals, claiming that: 1) contrary to a finding by the Review Board, it presented evidence that its TAD rule was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Olson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Prestige Homes, Inc. v. LegouffeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Russell v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- General Motors Corp. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Parkison v. James River Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- McHugh v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Willett v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.