Legal Opinion

Smith v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1934No. File No. 7621PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

This appeal grows out of an attempt to recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Rev. Code 19x9, § 9436 et seq., as amended). The plaintiff was accidentally injured in the course of his employment in the defendant’s beet sugar plant. A board of arbitration was waived and a hearing was had before the Industrial Commissioner. The commissioner took the evidece and made the following findings of fact:

“1. That the claimant, John Smith, was on the 20th day of June, 1931, and for some months prior to that time in the employ of the defendant, the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company, at its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Andrejwski v. Wolverine Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Edge v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Village of West Salem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wieber v. EnglandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Millard County v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Jacobson v. Strong & WaggonerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Humphreys v. Schuknecht Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Griffith v. National Guard, Military DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API