Legal Opinion

(PS)Singh v. United States Government

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 25, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02433Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RON SINGH, No. 2:17-cv-2433-JAM-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915.1 His 18 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 19 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 20 Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required 21 inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2),…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Adams v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API