Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Central Bank of the South

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 23, 1996No. 1940086PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Central Bank of the South ("Central Bank")1 petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Mobile County Circuit Court to vacate an order certifying a class in an action commenced against it by Catherine J. Lackey, or, in the alternative, to narrow the scope of the class. We grant the petition in part and deny it in part.

On October 28, 1991, Catherine Lackey purchased jointly with her husband, James H. Lackey, from Central Bank a one-year $10,000 certificate of deposit ("CD") yielding 5.875% interest — the prevailing "market rate" of interest for CDs of such "term and balance."…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gardebring v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Rios v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  4. FIRST ALABAMA BANK, ETC. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Ex Parte Newco Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Intratex Gas Co. v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ex Parte ShowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API