Carter State Bank v. Ross
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Beckham County; E. H. Gipson, Judge. Action by the Carter State Bank against W. B. Ross: Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
This action was prosecuted by the plaintiff in error to recover a balance claimed to be due on á promissory note. The defense was payment, and that more fhan, the amount claimed had been paid, with prayer for judgment for the excess. The trial was to the court and a jury, and a verdict returned for the defendant for the sum of $19.15. To review the judg ment rendered upon the verdict the plaintiff in error has prosecuted an appeal to this court.
■ It is urged that the court erred in permitting the jury to take to the jury room, when they retired to consider their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Perry v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Dane v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Pitchlynn v. CherrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Baumle v. VerdeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by16 opinions
- Horn v. SturmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Teeters v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Willoughby v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Egan v. First Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.