Legal Opinion

Siebe v. Heilman Machine Works

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1906No. 5,615PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Gibson Circuit Court; O. M. Welborn, Judge. Action by the Heilman Machine Works against Louis F. Siebe and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Action by appellee against appellants upon two promissory notes given for the purchase of a traction-engine. Appellants answered by pleading facts upon which an allegation of breach of warranty was based, and the waiver by appellee of a certain notice provided for in the warranty. Trial by jury, resulting in a verdict for appellee directed by a peremptory instruction. Appellants’ motion for a new trial was overruled and judgment pronounced upon the verdict.

A number of errors are assigned, but we will consider only those to which our attention has been called in the briefs.

1. After the cause…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haughton v. Aetna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Burnett v. MilnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. MarpleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Keck v. State ex rel. National Cash Register Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. MonfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. HaueisenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Paul v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API