Legal Opinion

In Re Fixico

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1918No. 8483PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Creek County ; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. E. H. Hoyt appeals from a decree adjudging Katie Fixico to be an incompetent and appointing a guardian for her person.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

From a decree adjudging Katie Fixico to be an incompetent and appointing a guardian for her person and estate, E. H. Hoyt prosecutes an appeal. Motion is filed to dismiss this proceeding for the reason that Hoyt is not an aggrieved person entitled to appeal from said order. The interest asserted' by Hoyt is that the decree casts a cloud upon his title to a certain oil and gas lease executed by Katie Fixico to H. R. Denton and by Denton as-' signed to Hoyt before the decree.

A party is aggrieved by a judgment or decree when it operates on his right of property or bears directly upon his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re BohananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Duroderigo v. CulwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. McKenna v. McKennaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1908
  4. Sherer v. ShererSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  5. Smith v. ChaneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daniels v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API