Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Barnett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 30, 1926No. 17671PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
On March 2, 1915, application was made to the county court of Ok-mulgee county, in which it was claimed that Katie Fixico, a full-blood Creek Indian woman, was an incompetent, and praying that she be so declared and that a guardian of her person and estate be appointed. On the same day notice was posted, and which was served on her on March 8th, that a hearing would be had at 10 o’clock on March 12,1915. Katie Fixico did not appear at the time and place fixed for such hearing, and the hearing was postponed until 10 o’clock, March 24, 1915, and on the 13th day of March, 1915, the county judge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ozark Oil Co. v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Martin v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- In Re Hickory's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- In Re Guardianship of JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- In Re Guardianship of Winnett v. RiberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Colby v. JacobsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- In Re Parker's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Sebring v. BigheartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Ark of Refuge Rest Home Corp. v. ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.