Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 28, 2009No. A09A1991, A09A2093PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.
A jury convicted Belinda McKenzie and her aunt, Emma McKenzie, of twenty counts of identity fraud and four counts of forgery in the first degree. In Case No. A09A1991, Belinda McKenzie alleges the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions for identity fraud, the state failed to prove venue, and the continuing witness rule was violated. In Case No. A09A2093, Emma McKenzie alleges the same errors. Because the appeals involve the same set of facts, we have combined them in the interest of judicial economy.
1. The McKenzies first contend the evidence was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Flournoy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- State v. MayzeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Hinton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Rasch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- MOORE v. THE STATE (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Stacey D. Williams, Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Feriena Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Reginald Zhon Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.