Legal Opinion

MOORE v. THE STATE (Two Cases)

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 17, 2021No. S21A0220, S21A0221PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

311 Ga. 506

FINAL COPY S21A0220. MOORE v. THE STATE. S21A0221. MILBOURNE v. THE STATE. BOGGS, Justice. Simeon Gashon Moore and Walter Vernell Milbourne challenge their 2016 convictions for malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting of Jamie Milton and the shooting death of Milton’s girlfriend, Jamie Moore (“Jamie”). Moore contends that the evidence presented at trial was legally insufficient to show that he shared responsibility for Jamie’s death and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to a conflict of interest. Milbourne contends that the trial court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  2. MUSE v. THE STATE (Three Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  3. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  4. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  5. Wilkerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API