Legal Opinion

Hamidian v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 22, 1992No. 67,266PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an action upon an automobile insurance policy seeking recovery of uninsured motorist and personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company on the grounds that the complained-of injuries and death did not arise out of the ownership, operation, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle. The plaintiffs appeal therefrom.

The undisputed tragic facts may be summarized as follows. On January 25, 1989, Saed Razizadeh drove his 1985 Oldsmobile to the Midland…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Shinabarger v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. OlivierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  4. Race v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rischitelli v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DeHaanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Le v. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  5. Roque v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API