Legal Opinion

Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 1991No. C11-078; CA A65468PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s denial of his claim for penalties for late payment of wages under ORS 652.150.1 We affirm.

Plaintiff brought this action for nonpayment of overtime wages and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 USC § 201 et seq. As an alternative to his claim under FLSA, plaintiff alleged that he was entitled to unpaid overtime wages under former OAR 839-21-017 and ORS 653.055.2 In a second claim for relief, he alleged that he was entitled to penalties under ORS 652.150. In Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc., 93 Or App 520, 763 P2d 173 (1988), we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Texas v. Wildish Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hanson v. Signer Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cornier v. Paul Tulacz, DVM PCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API