Mayfly Group, Inc. v. Ruiz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing its claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The trial court dismissed the claims after concluding that they were based on a contract that was illegal and, therefore, unenforceable. Plaintiff assigns error to the dismissal, arguing that, although performance of the contract violated a licensing statute, that violation did not automatically render the contract unenforceable as contrary to public policy. We agree, and reverse and remand.
In reviewing the dismissal of a complaint under ORCP 21, we accept as true all allegations in the complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Granewich v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Harmon v. Mt. Hood Meadows, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Wheeler v. Bucksteel Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Mossberg v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Stanton v. MedellinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- MAYFLY GROUP, INC. v. RuizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Mossberg v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.