Legal Opinion

Mayfly Group, Inc. v. Ruiz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2006No. 02C-20119; A124917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing its claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The trial court dismissed the claims after concluding that they were based on a contract that was illegal and, therefore, unenforceable. Plaintiff assigns error to the dismissal, arguing that, although performance of the contract violated a licensing statute, that violation did not automatically render the contract unenforceable as contrary to public policy. We agree, and reverse and remand.

In reviewing the dismissal of a complaint under ORCP 21, we accept as true all allegations in the complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Granewich v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Harmon v. Mt. Hood Meadows, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Wheeler v. Bucksteel Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Mossberg v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Stanton v. MedellinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. MAYFLY GROUP, INC. v. RuizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Mossberg v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API