Auto-Owners Insurance v. Rhodes
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEARN, C.J.:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company appeals from the denial of its motion to vacate and/or stay this declaratory judgment action to determine coverage under an insurance policy, following this court’s reversal and remand of the companion tort action for damages. In the alternative, Auto-Owners contends the circuit court erred in finding Marion Eadon d/b/a C & B Fabrication an insured under the policy, there was an occurrence resulting in property damage, and that none of the argued exclusions contained in the policy apply. We affirm as modified.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Marion Eadon is…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Chantel Associates v. Mount Vernon Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pinnacle Group, Inc. v. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. RhodesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. FishDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010