State ex rel. Tulley v. Brown

At the outset, it should be noted that the parties neither raised nor argued any constitutional objections2 to the overall concept of the Attorney General’s *237statutory power of preliminary examination concerning proposed constitutional amendments under R. 0. Chapter 3519. Thus, and since it is neither necessary to our resolution of the matter before us nor determinative of our jurisdiction to act, a majority of the court reaches no conclusion upon that question.

We note jurisdiction of this matter upon the basis of State, ex rel. Riley Constr. Co., v. East Liverpool Bd. of Edn. (1967), 10 Ohio…