Legal Opinion

Ruh v. Ruh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1979No. 791PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

Appellant takes this appeal from the lower court’s denial of his petition to set aside that court’s decree nisi, by which the lower court directed that appellant should hold one-half of certain property in a constructive trust for the benefit of his ex-wife. We find that the lower court erred in denying appellant’s petition and, therefore, we reverse.

Appellant makes several arguments in support of his position, but the central issue in his appeal is whether his exceptions to the decree nisi were timely. The lower court’s decree nisi was filed on January 9, 1975. At…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. FiorentinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Brodsky v. Philadelphia Athletic Club, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Wittig v. CarlacciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Karpe v. Borough of StroudsburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Mumma v. Boswell, Tintner, Piccola & WickershamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API