Legal Opinion

Mumma v. Boswell, Tintner, Piccola & Wickersham

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Robert M. Mumma, II, (Mumma) appeals from the trial court’s October 9, 2006 order denying his petition to strike and/or open the judgments entered as a result of his failure to file a timely certificate of merit in support of his claims of professional negligence. See Pa.R.C.P. 1042.1-1042.8. Mumma also appeals from the trial court’s November 8, 2006 order granting preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer in favor of Boswell, Tintner, Piccola and Wickersham (BTPW), the Estate of Robert Mumma (the Estate), Lisa Morgan (Morgan), Barbara Mumma, and George…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frazier v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Ditch v. Waynesboro HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Crystal Lake Camps v. AlfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Nevyas v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Zokaites Contracting Inc. v. Trant Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Hawbaker, J. v. Nottingham VillageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Heim, M. v. Eissler, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Kandjabanga, F. v. Drexel Univ.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Paige, S. v. Reed, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API