Legal Opinion

Landow v. Georgetown-Inland West Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1982No. 80-1313PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

Appellant/buyer brought suit against ap-pellee/seller seeking to enforce an alleged oral modification of a contract for the sale of land. Appellant charged that appellee failed to comply with the oral agreement between the parties which provided that the date for settlement on the written contract would be held open indefinitely while appellant attempted to secure certain permits from the District of Columbia government. The trial court granted summary judgment for appellee holding that the oral modification was unenforceable because it was in violation of the Statute…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. H. Max Ammerman v. City Stores CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Willis v. CheekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Ellis v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Reichman v. Franklin Simon Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Burnford v. BlanningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Schneider v. Dumbarton Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. T Street Development, LLC v. Dereje and DerejeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Railan v. KatyalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Aronoff v. Lenkin Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API