Legal Opinion
Jaqua v. Shewalter
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1893No. 1,069PublishedCited by 6 opinions
From the Randolph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The appellee brought this action, against the appellant.
His complaint is in these words, omitting the formal parts:
“The plaintiff complains of the defendants and says, that heretofore, to wit, on the-day of January, 1887, the plaintiff and the defendants John T. Hanlin and Clark H. Croninger were partners doing business in the name and style of Shewalter, Hanlin & Co., and, as such firm, they sold and delivered to said defendant Alonzo L. Jaqua certain goods, wares, and merchandise, of the value of four thousand dollars; a bill of particulars of which is filed herewith and made a part hereof;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Green v. LouthainIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Riley v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Howorth v. ScarceIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Lawson v. SherraIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morse v. McGradyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Standard Auto Ins. Assn. v. ReeseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Townsend v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Acker v. MassmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Alburn v. BurgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.