Legal Opinion

Jaqua v. Shewalter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1893No. 1,069PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellee brought this action, against the appellant.

His complaint is in these words, omitting the formal parts:

“The plaintiff complains of the defendants and says, that heretofore, to wit, on the-day of January, 1887, the plaintiff and the defendants John T. Hanlin and Clark H. Croninger were partners doing business in the name and style of Shewalter, Hanlin & Co., and, as such firm, they sold and delivered to said defendant Alonzo L. Jaqua certain goods, wares, and merchandise, of the value of four thousand dollars; a bill of particulars of which is filed herewith and made a part hereof;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Green v. LouthainIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Riley v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Howorth v. ScarceIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Lawson v. SherraIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morse v. McGradyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Standard Auto Ins. Assn. v. ReeseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Townsend v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Acker v. MassmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Alburn v. BurgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API