Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Tyler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1891No. 175PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The appellants were the plaintiffs below, and commenced this action against the appellee Hiram B. Tyler, on an account which had been assigned to them by the appellee George C. Tyler, who was made a party defendant to answer as to any interest he may have had in said account.

The appellee Hiram B. Tyler answered in two paragraphs: First. General denial. Second. Set-off.

The appellants demurred to the second paragraph of ap- ’ pellee’s answer, which was overruled, and excepted to. Appellants then replied by general denial.

The cause was tried by a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pearcy v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Block v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Kennedy v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Boil v. SimmsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Rice v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Brower v. NellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. State v. LauthOregon Supreme Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API