Legal Opinion

Bartl v. G. Weinberger & Co. (In re Claxton)

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 8, 1983No. Bankruptcy No. 79-684-APublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MARTIN V.B. BOSTETTER, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

In this action, Richard A. Bartl, Receiver 1 (hereafter the “Trustee”) seeks a determination that the “judgment lien” held by defendant G. Weinberger & Co. (“Weinber-ger”) is fraudulent as to creditors of the bankruptcy estate and is, therefore, null and void.

Weinberger initially obtained a judgment in the amount of $208,812.50 against Clax-ton; III in a Pennsylvania court in November of 1978. The defendant domesticated this judgment by entry of a consent judgment in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia, on June 5, 1979.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gratiot County State Bank v. Johnson Ex Rel. St. Louis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Gross v. Russo (In Re Russo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  3. Tucker v. FosterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. In Re Great Western Biscuit Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1949
  5. In Re Entertainment IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of ClaxtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  2. In Re LainesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  3. Johnson v. Cadles of Grassy Meadows, II, LLC (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  4. Leigh v. HolmesFairfax County Circuit Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API