Legal Opinion
Zapata v. IBP, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 5, 1995No. 93-2366-EEOPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
The court has before it the Motion of Defendant for Additional Protective Order (doc. 179). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) and 60(b), it seeks an order “to provide that the information produced in the pretrial discovery in this case not be disclosed to anyone outside this litigation unless and until such information is admitted into evidence and becomes part of the Court’s record of this ease.” The requested order would apply to discovery provided both previously and prospectively. As grounds for the motion defendant asserts that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re San Juan Star Company, Pedro Juan Soto v. Carlos Romero Barcelo, in Re Pedro Juan Soto, Pedro Juan Soto v. Carlos Romero Barcelo, Miguel Hernandez Agosto, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Koster v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Wyeth Laboratories, a Division of American Home Products Corporation v. United States District Court for the District of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Chaparro v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reed v. BennettDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Horizon Holdings, L.L.C. v. Genmar Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Johnson v. Olathe District SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- High Point Sarl v. Sprint Nextel Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Wolhar v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.