Porras v. State

The appellant was charged with and convicted of selling to one Manuel Gonzales two bottles of wine in violation of the prohibition laws of the state. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order overruling his motion for a new trial, and assigns several errors. These errors are that the judgment is not supported by the evidence nor by the law; in the admission and rejection of evidence ; and in misdirecting the jury.

The evidence as to the corpus delicti was conflicting. The prosecuting witness testified positively that he purchased the *132two bottles of wine from the appellant,…