Legal Opinion

Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. Medley

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 8, 2009No. 08-2332, 08-2379PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TASHIMA, Senior Circuit Judge.

We must decide whether the district court erred in issuing a preliminary injunction against proceedings pending before the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (“MCAD”) on the ground that federal law preempted state law claims because the district court was required to abstain from deciding the preemption issue under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 45-47, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). We conclude that where, as here, the preemption determination would require the district court to resolve a novel question of law, preemption is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Sirva Relocation, LLC v. Golar RichieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. Massachusetts Delivery Ass'n v. CoakleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Minnesota Living Assistance v. Ken B. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  4. Christian Action Network v. MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
  5. Verizon New England, Inc. v. Rhode Island Department of Labor & TrainingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API