Sirva Relocation, LLC v. Golar Richie
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), the Supreme Court enunciated a doctrine of abstention. Fidelity to that doctrine requires federal courts, in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, to refrain from interfering with certain state proceedings. See id. at 43-45, 91 S.Ct. 746. The Supreme Court recently revisited the Younger doctrine, clarified its operation, and narrowed its scope. See Sprint Commc’ns, Inc. v. Jacobs, -— U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 584, 187 L.Ed.2d 505 (2013). This case affords us our first opportunity to consider the impact…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Melissa Cook v. Cynthia HardingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Shafik Wassef v. Dennis TibbenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Minnesota Living Assistance v. Ken B. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- In Re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-NashirCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Altice USA Inc v. New Jersey Board of Public UtyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.