Legal Opinion

Frontier Lanes v. CANADIAN INDEMNITY

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 2, 1980No. 7321-4-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

—Frontier Lanes and Vitrol, Inc., plaintiffs in an action for declaratory judgment and breach of contract, appeal from the trial court's granting of defendants' motion for summary judgment. Defendants, a group of insurance companies, seek cross review of the trial court's refusal to grant summary judgment on four additional bases.

Frontier Lanes and Vitrol, Inc. (Frontier) operated a north Seattle bowling alley. Canadian Indemnity and the other insurance companies (Canadian) issued a series of policies to Frontier insuring against specific risks to the building housing the bowling alley. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hatley v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Northwest Collectors, Inc. v. EndersWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Lundgren v. KierenWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Bruener v. Twin City Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Graham v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bank of California, N. A. v. W. H. Opie, California Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Bowers v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API