Legal Opinion

Vaccaro v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 2, 1974No. Nos. 71 Civ. 1049, 71 Civ. 1191 and 71 Civ. 2828PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:

Defendant Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. has moved pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and pursuant to Rule 9 of this court’s General Rules for an order to consolidate the above captioned actions.

Plaintiffs in each of the above captioned actions were injured in the number two lower hold of the SS MORMACLYNX, a vessel owned by the movant. In pre-trial deposition it was stated that Philip De Marco was injured when a piece of lumber hit him on the head; that Dominick Vaccaro was injured when he went to the aid of De Marco; and that Vincent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stemler v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  2. Stein, Hall & Co. v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Milner v. National Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Werner v. Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & BurkeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Bank of Montreal v. Eagle AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Federal Election Commission v. Florida for Kennedy CommitteeDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
  4. Monzo v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Quinn Bros. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API