Bank of Montreal v. Eagle Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*531OPINION and ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is a diversity action arising out of three promissory notes (“Eagle Notes”) executed by defendants Howard R. Schuster (“Schuster”) and Robert R. Bolding (“Bolding”) as sole general partners of Eagle Associates (“Eagle”). Pursuant to these notes, defendants agreed to pay plaintiff, Bank of Montreal (the “Bank”), the amount of $2,017,250 on May 15, 1984. Plaintiff now brings this action to collect a remaining balance of $150,000, plus interest due and owing on said notes. Plaintiff also seeks all costs and expenses arising out of efforts to enforce…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. American Recording & Broadcasting Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Werner v. Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & BurkeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Dal-Briar Corp. v. Baskette, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Karuk Tribe of California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ v. KeatingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.