Diezcabeza v. Lynch
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEIN, District Judge.
Sergio Diezcabeza brought this action pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants John E. Lynch, Robert McCarroll, and an individual denominated as “McFarlin” violated plaintiffs Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Defendant Lynch has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (PLRA). 1 For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted.
I. Background
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dixon v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Yankees Entertainment & Sports Network, LLC v. Cablevision Systems Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Precision Valve Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Dillard v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- Marrero v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.