Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Goord
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 2002No. 01 CIV. 1660(VM)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mark Dixon (“Dixon”), proceeding pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming violations of his constitutional rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Defendants, the Commissioner of the New York Department of Corrections (“DOCS”) and other DOCS officials and corrections officers (collectively, “Defendants”), have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the claims against them. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Arnold v. GoetzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Scott v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Johnson v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Sweet v. Wende Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Randolph v. SimmonsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.