Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Hughes

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 7, 1903No. 56PublishedCited by 150 opinions

Bi-R.-R.n-R. TO THE SUPREME COURT ON THE STATE-OP PENNSYLVANIA. The defendants in error brought suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, to recover for injuries to a horse shipped by them from Albany in the State'of New York to Cynwyd, in the State of Pennsylvania.

Read the full summary

Bi-R.-R.n-R. TO THE SUPREME COURT ON THE STATE-OP PENNSYLVANIA. The defendants in error brought suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, to recover for injuries to a horse shipped by them from Albany in the State'of New York to Cynwyd, in the State of Pennsylvania. The shipment was under a bill of lading of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, bearing date of August 10, 1900. It recited the receipt of the horse— "for transportation from-to destination, if on the said carrier’s line of railroad otherwise to the place where…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

The right to review the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania herein depends upon the proper assertion of a right or privilege under the Federal Constitution or statutes which was denied to the plaintiff in error by the adverse holding of the state court.

Upon the trial in the Common Pleas Court, it was contended that the special contract above recited limited the recovery of the plaintiff to the sum of one hundred dollars. The court refused to so charge, but, holding that the policy and law of Pennsylvania, as declared by her courts of last resort, did not permit such limitations on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SolanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API