Legal Opinion

Martin v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1935No. 13242PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs in this suit, who were the sole heirs of J. S. Martin, deceased, sought recovery of title to an undivided one-half interest of the oil and gas and other minerals in 160 acres in the northwest comer of the F. W. Huseman survey and also for ¾6 of all royalties accruing from 2½ acres out of said 160-acre tract which was drilled by the Texas Company, one of the defendants.

J. L. Schnackenberg was made a defendant upon allegations that he was asserting title adverse to that of plaintiffs. He filed an answer disclaiming title to the mineral rights in a portion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. GoldfrankTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gilmore v. O'NeilTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Elliott v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kelley Island Lime & Transport Co. v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Cothran v. Marmaduke & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hoover v. WukaschTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Gray v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Frede v. LauderdaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Hoover v. WukaschTexas Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API