Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Wukasch

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1953No. A-3668PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert

the Court.

C. G. Wuka,sch and wife, Emma Wukasch, and their son, Walter Wukasch, as agent, sued R. C. Hoover for damages for breach of a lease contract.

The contract on which the suit was based was dated July 1, 1948, was signed “C. G. Wukasch Emma Wukasch By Walter Wukasch, Agent in Fact,” and for a recited consideration of $23,040.00, payable $360.00 per month for the first two years and $400..00 per month for the remainder of the contract period, leased to Hoover for a five year period beginning October 1, 1948, and ending September 30, 1953, “all those improvements and that parcel of land…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wilson v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Dority v. DorityTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Graves v. Cameron, Castles & StoreyTexas Supreme Court · 1890

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ford v. CulbertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Samson Exploration, LLC (Formerly Samson Lone Star, L.P.) v. T.S. Reed Properties, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Broaddus v. GroutTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StetsonTexas Supreme Court · 1965

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API