Legal Opinion

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 2002No. B151002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CURRY, J.

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) determined that respondent Byung Hoon Yoon, doing business as Universal Painting Company (Universal), was a licensed contractor despite his failure to obtain workers’ compensation insurance covering respondent Sung Mi Lee, and thus respondent Alma Piston Company, doing business as Tomadur Engine Company (Tomadur), which had hired Yoon, was not liable for workers’ compensation benefits paid to Lee. Stephen J. Smith, Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, acting in his capacity as administrator of the Uninsured…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cedillo v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Wright v. ISSAKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Go v. Pacific Health Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Minority Voting Trust v. Orange County Nursery, Inc. (In Re Orange County Nursery, Inc.)District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Burd v. Barkley Court Reporters, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API