Legal Opinion

Ditmore v. . Rexford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 27, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from Garter, J., at March Term, 1913, of SwaiN.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, O. J.

This was a proceeding for partition of land begun before the clerk. The defendants pleaded sole seisin and the cause was transferred to the court at term. It became then in effect an action of ejectment. Hunnicutt v. Brooks, 116 N. C., 792; Sipe v. Sherman, 161 N. C., 109.

The plaintiffs introduced a quitclaim deed from George Bum-garner to Daniel D. Foute (under whom the plaintiffs claim as heirs at law) and three others, dated 3 January,- 1853. This deed recites tbat it embraces land covered, by certain entries therein named, which are the land in controversy. These entries had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. House v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Gupton v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Tillery v. Whiteville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Jernigan v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Higgins v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Richmond Cedar Works v. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API