Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Turner, Admr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1931No. 2076PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs in error, Glenn Hoover, S.J. Black and Lloyd Riley, were defendants below, and defendant in error, George S. Turner, administrator, was plaintiff. We refer to them as they appeared in the trial court. The action is to reverse a judgment of the trial court for the plaintiff in the sum of $19,000, representative of a verdict of $28,000, upon which the trial court entered a remittitur of $9,000. The action was for the benefit of the husband and next of kin, under the wrongful death statute. It was the claim that the defendants were jointly engaged in the operation of a truck line,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Stormont v. New York Central Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Reeves v. City of SpringfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Smith v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API