Legal Opinion

Fusaro v. Porter-Hayden Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1989PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Helen Freedman, J.

INTRODUCTION

In the context of motions to dismiss and strike claims for injuries allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos products, this court is called upon to deal with the interplay of the various Statutes of Limitations now applicable to toxic tort claims and to determine whether the "second-injury rule” shall apply to the asbestos litigation now burgeoning in New York.

Prior to 1986, causes of action accrued at the time of exposure to a harmful substance despite the fact that manifestation of the injury often did not occur until well after the Statute…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Brock v. BuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Askey v. Occidental Chemical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. In Re Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. Abbatiello v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  5. Miller v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API