Legal Opinion

Christophersen & Kiaer, Inc. v. United States Navigation Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegelberg, J.

This is an action upon an agreement of the defendant to pay the plaintiff a share of loading agency commissions received by the defendant on ships secured by the plaintiff.

That the plaintiff earned its commission cannot be and is not seriously denied. The defendant, however, attacks the plaintiff's right to institute this action for its failure to pay the federal tax assessed on ship brokers. Section 1001 of the Internal Revenue Act of 1919 (40 U. S. Stat. at Large, 1127) provides: “ That on and after January 1, 1919 there shall be levied, collected, and paid annually the following special…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pratt v. . ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Griffith v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Sunflower Lumber Co. v. Turner Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Goldsmith v. Manufacturers' Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  5. Aiken v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farber v. John Aquino Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. East Coast Moving & Storage, Inc. v. FlappinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API