Legal Opinion
Summerbell v. Weller
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 15, 1930No. Docket No. 5759PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, pursuant to an order sustaining demurrers to second amended complaint without leave to amend complaint.
The undertaking (exhibit “A” of the second amended complaint) is the statutory bond required by section 1 of the Public Works Act (Stats. 1919, p. 487), enacted to secure the payment of claims of persons employed by contractors upon public works, etc. (Continental Nat. Bank v. Republic Casualty Co., 202 Cal. 586 [262 Pac. 300]; Stone v. Shackelford, 64 Cal. App. 750 [222 Pac. 846].)
It is contended by respondent United States Fidelity &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williamson v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. ShaferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Continental National Bank of Los Angeles v. Republic Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Evans v. ShackelfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Glens Falls Indemnity Company, a Corporation, and E. F. Grandy, Inc., a Corporation v. American Seating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Lamson Co., Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933